Dr. Trivedi
Monnet
X, Dres
M, Ferré
A, Le
Teuff G, Jozwiak
M, Bleibtreu
A, Le
Deley MC, Chemla
D, Richard
C, Teboul
JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous
non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients:
comparison with four other dynamic indices. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Sep;109(3):330-8. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
A
debate within the realm of anesthesia continues over the best hemodynamic
monitoring tool. Traditional static measures such as central venous pressure
and pulmonary artery occlusion pressures are now being replaced by dynamic
indices. Monnet and colleagues sought to compare non invasive arterial pulse
pressure variation (PPV) to invasive PPV, respiratory variation of pulse
contour-derived stroke volume, and changes in cardiac index induced by passive
leg raising (PLR) and end-expiratory occlusion (EEO) tests. The PPV, the
respiratory variation of arterial pulse pressures induced by mechanical
ventilation, estimates stroke volume with relatively good accuracy. PLR acts as
a “self volume challenge” and the effects of PLR on the cardiac output can
predict fluid responsiveness. The EEO is a newer tool which involves occluding the respiratory circuit for a few
seconds at end-expiration interrupting the venous return that occurs at each
mechanical inspiration resulting increase in cardiac preload. Patient populations which may have the
greatest benefit from new dynamic indices, the critically ill with hemodynamic
failure, were chosen as the focus for this study. 47 critically ill patients
were chosen. Baseline
non-invasive
and invasive PPVs, stroke volume variation, and
changes in cardiac index induced by PLR and EEO were recorded. The patient was
then administered 500 ml of saline and the response recorded. CNAP could not
record arterial pressures in 8 patients which the authors attribute to severe
vasoconstriction from vasopressors and/or micro thrombi. Fluid increased
cardiac index by ≥15% in 17 'responders' out of the remaining 39 patients. A
limitation is that in patients with low tidal volumes the changes in
intrathoracic pressure might be so low that changes in cardiac preload could be
too low to challenge the preload-dependent stroke volume. The PLR may be useful
in this case since it would allow testing for fluid responsiveness even in
ventilated patients with low tidal volumes and lung compliance. The authors
found that combing multiple dynamic indices did not prove to have higher
accuracy in terms of fluid responsiveness and that non-invasive assessment of PPV appears
to be of great utility in this patient population.
Estimating fluid
status in the post surgical ICU can be challenging as patients indices are
increasingly challenged by failing organs and influenced by measures such as
dialysis. In addition to the influence of ventilation, the PPV can also be
invalidated by developed arrhythmias which are frequent in this population. In
addition to the use of PPV and other static and dynamic measures, I found the
use of transthoracic ultrasound to be of great utility in a situation of
uncertainty. A quick look at the heart by the anesthesiologist at bedside can
reveal valuable information about the overall function/contractility of the
heart as well as fluid status as the heart may appear overfilled/ volume
overloaded or under filled/ “kissing.”